Subject
Fwd: Re: VN on Huckleberry Finn?
From
Date
Body
----- Forwarded message from STADLEN@aol.com -----
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:23:43 EST
From: STADLEN@aol.com
Reply-To: STADLEN@aol.com
Subject: Re: VN on Huckleberry Finn?
To:
In a message dated 09/03/2005 03:07:00 GMT Standard Time,
chtodel@gss.ucsb.edu (i.e. Brian Boyd) writes:
> the second crassly and insensitively treating Jim as simply the appropriate
> object of demeaning "darkie" jokes. I would love HF to have been only the
> first two thirds of the
> novel: then it would be a triumph. Alas, it is flawed and, while
> unequivocally anti-slavery, quite stolidly racist.
>
I will reread HF. I do not remember it like this. I remember it as showing
(and surely ridiculing) the romanticism of Tom Sawyer putting poor Jim through
all sorts of horrible experiences with creepy-crawly creatures before allowing
him to "escape", and Jim's patient tolerance and courtesy about this. No doubt
there's an element of showing up Jim as too ready to put up with this. But
he's a kind man, dealing with boys. Isn't Mark Twain showing in comic fashion
how patronising and subservience survive the possibility and reality of freedom
and emancipation?
However, Brian Boyd is someone to be taken seriously, and I will have another
look.
Anthony Stadlen
----- End forwarded message -----