Vladimir Nabokov

NABOKV-L post 0016331, Sat, 3 May 2008 17:59:05 +0000

Subject
Re: SIGNS: Some responses (the name Rebecca, numbers, beach plums)
Date
Body
Yes, this has puzzled me. How does the third call lead to that conclusion? And why does the mother think that the caller can distinguish O and zero? On mid 20th-century dial telephones there was no O with the 6 (just MN), or am I wrong? If there was, didn't it share the same slot as the zero?


----- Original Message ----
From: Anthony Stadlen <STADLEN@AOL.COM>
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Friday, 2 May, 2008 3:55:18 PM
Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] SIGNS: Some responses (the name Rebecca, numbers, beach plums)

In a message dated 02/05/2008 11:43:29 GMT Standard Time,
NABOKV-L@HOLYCROSS.EDU writes:
Not a zero, as Jansy said. Dolinin relates it to various things.
Was it someone here who said that if the third call was the same
mistake, it would make 666?

I said that, in Dec. 2004, and pointed out that Christianly it is
the number of the Beast, the Antichrist, death, etc. etc. But I also
pointed out that Jewishly, by Gematria, three 6s make 18, which is life
([chet=8] + [yud=10]). So that as a symbol or sign the three 6s
are completely ambiguous.

Anthony Stadlen
Search
the Nabokv-L archive with Google
Contact
the Editors
All private editorial communications, without
exception, are
read by both co-editors.
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies


___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! For Good. Give and get cool things for free, reduce waste and help our planet. Plus find hidden Yahoo! treasure

http://green.yahoo.com/uk/earth-day/

Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en

Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm






Attachment