My previous post (¡°shaving, Beirut, old Zembla's fields, empires of rhyme, Indies of calculus & Count Komarovski in Pale Fire¡±) is incomplete and should be continued as follows:

 

In Speak, Memory VN describes his Staunton chessmen and compares a small crimson crown on the brow of the king¡¯s knight to the round mark on a happy Hindu¡¯s forehead:

 

My Staunton chessmen (a twenty-year-old set given to me by my father¡¯s Englished brother, Konstantin), splendidly massive pieces, of tawny or black wood, up to four and a quarter inches tall, displayed their shiny contours as if conscious of the part they played. Alas, if examined closely, some of the men were seen to be chipped (after traveling in their box through the fifty or sixty lodgings I had changed during those years); but the top of the king¡¯s rook and the brow of the king¡¯s knight still showed a small crimson crown painted upon them, recalling the round mark on a happy Hindu¡¯s forehead. (Chapter Fourteen, 3)

 

Describing his best chess problem, VN mentions the false scent in which a pawn becomes a knight:

 

The false scent, the irresistible ¡°try¡± is: Pawn to b8, becoming a knight, with three beautiful mates following in answer to disclosed checks by Black; but Black can defeat the whole brilliant affair by not checking White and making instead a modest dilatory move elsewhere on the board. (ibid.)

 

In VN¡¯s novel The Real Life of Sebastian Knight (1941) the narrator (Sebastian¡¯s half-brother V.) is a black pawn (on b7) at the beginning that becomes a knight (on a1) at the end. The characters of TRLSK include Mr. Goodman, Sebastian¡¯s biographer. The narrator compares Mr. Goodman¡¯s face to a cow¡¯s udder:

 

'My name,' she said, 'is Helen Pratt. I have overheard as much of your conversation as I could stand and there is a little thing I want to ask you. Clare Bishop is a great friend of mine. There's something she wants to find out. Could I talk to you one of these days?'
I said yes, most certainly, and we fixed the time.
'I knew Mr Knight quite well,' she added, looking at me with bright round eyes.
'Oh, really,' said I, not quite knowing what else to say.
'Yes,' she went on, 'he was an amazing personality, and I don't mind telling you that I loathed Goodman's book about him.'
'What do you mean?' I asked. 'What book?'
'Oh, the one he has just written. I was going over the proofs with him this last week. Well, I must be running. Thank you so much.'
She darted away and very slowly I descended the steps. Mr Goodman's large soft pinkish face was, and is, remarkably like a cow's udder. (Chapter Six)

 

One of Sebastian Knight¡¯s books is entitled Lost Property. Dobro being Russian for ¡°goods, property,¡± the name Goodman brings to mind the Russian saying ne ubit¡¯ bobra, ne nazhit¡¯ dobra (one cannot make a fortune without killing a beaver). A tall bearded man, Kinbote was nicknamed the Great Beaver:

 

One day I happened to enter the English Literature office in quest of a magazine with the picture of the Royal Palace in Onhava, which I wanted my friend to see, when I overheard a young instructor in a green velvet jacket, whom I shall mercifully call Gerald Emerald, carelessly saying in answer to something the secretary had asked: "I guess Mr Shade has already left with the Great Beaver." Of course, I am quite tall, and my brown beard is of a rather rich tint and texture; the silly cognomen evidently applied to me, but was not worth noticing, and after calmly taking the magazine from a pamphlet-cluttered table, I contented myself on my way out with pulling Gerald Emerald's bow-tie loose with a deft jerk of my fingers as I passed by him. (Foreword)

 

Kinbote¡¯s Foreword to Pale Fire is dated Oct. 19, 1959. On this day (the Lyceum anniversary) Kinbote completes his work on Shade¡¯s poem and commits suicide. There is a hope that, after Kinbote¡¯s death, Botkin (Shade¡¯s, Kinbote¡¯s and Gradus¡¯ ¡°real¡± name) Botkin will be ¡°full¡± again. In TRLSK the narrator quotes a passage from Lost Property:

 

¡°All things belong to the same order of things, for such is the oneness of human perception, the oneness of individuality, the oneness of matter, whatever matter may be. The only real number is one, the rest are mere repetition¡± (ibid.,
page 83). (Chapter 11)

 

The title of Mr Goodman¡¯s book, The Tragedy of Sebastian Knight, brings to mind VN¡¯s play in blank verse Tragediya gospodina Morna (¡°The Tragedy of Mr Morn,¡± 1924) which, in turn, reminds one of Gumilyov¡¯s play Krasota Morni (¡°The Beauty of Morni,¡± 1921). In his poem Ya vezhliv s zhizn¡¯yu sovremennoyu¡­ (¡°I¡¯m polite with modern life¡­¡± 1913) Gumilyov says that he is not geroy tragicheskiy (a tragic hero):

 

§¯§à §ß§Ö§ä, §ñ §ß§Ö §Ô§Ö§â§à§Û §ä§â§Ñ§Ô§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú§Û,
§Á §Ú§â§à§ß§Ú§é§ß§Ö§Ö §Ú §ã§å§ê§Ö,
§Á §Ù§Ý§ð§ã§î, §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ú§Õ§à§Ý §Þ§Ö§ä§Ñ§Ý§Ý§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú§Û
§³§â§Ö§Õ§Ú §æ§Ñ§â§æ§à§â§à§Ó§í§ç §Ú§Ô§â§å§ê§Ö§Ü.

 

Yet I'm no tragic hero - way too rough,
Ironic, jaded, dryly chiding,
An iron idol that's consumed with wrath
Amongst the statuettes of china.

 

The (imperfect) rhyme sushe (more dryly) ¨C igrushek (toys) brings to mind the rhyme igrushek ¨C lyagushek (frogs) in Derzhavin¡¯s poem ¡°In Praise of the Mosquito¡± (see the quote in my previous post).

 

At the end of TRLSK the narrator says that, despite Sebastian¡¯s death, the hero remains:

 

And then the masquerade draws to a close. The bald little prompter shuts his book, as the light fades gently. The end, the end. They all go back to their everyday life (and Clare goes back to her grave) ¨C but the hero remains, for, try as I may, I cannot get out of my part: Sebastian's mask clings to my face, the likeness will not be washed off. I am Sebastian, or Sebastian is I, or perhaps we both are someone whom neither of us knows. (chapter 20)

 

Sebastian dies in a sanatorium in St Damier. Damier is French for ¡°chessboard.¡± In his Commentary Kinbote mentions Oswin Bretwit, a retired diplomat whose surname means in Zemblan ¡°Chess Intelligence.¡± In Paris Gradus (Shade¡¯s murderer) offers to Oswin Bretwit the correspondence between Oswin¡¯s grand-uncle Zule and his cousin Ferz:

 

The scripta in question were two hundred and thirteen long letters which had passed some seventy years ago between Zule Bretwit, Oswin's grand-uncle, Mayor of Odevalla, and a cousin of his Ferz Bretwit, Mayor of Aros. (note to Line 286)

 

Ferz¡¯ is Russian for ¡°chess queen.¡± In a letter of the first part of January ¨C February 14, 1825, to Katenin Griboedov (the future Russian envoy in Teheran) compares Sofia (a character in Griboedov¡¯s play ¡°Woe from Wit,¡± 1824) to ferz¡¯:

 

§¬§ä§à-§ä§à §ã§à §Ù§Ý§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó§í§Õ§å§Þ§Ñ§Ý §à§Ò §ß§×§Þ, §é§ä§à §à§ß §ã§å§Þ§Ñ§ã§ê§Ö§Õ§ê§Ú§Û, §ß§Ú§Ü§ä§à §ß§Ö §á§à§Ó§Ö§â§Ú§Ý, §Ú §Ó§ã§Ö §á§à§Ó§ä§à§â§ñ§ð§ä, §Ô§à§Ý§à§ã §à§Ò§ë§Ö§Ô§à §ß§Ö§Õ§à§Ò§â§à§ç§à§ä§ã§ä§Ó§Ñ §Ú §Õ§à §ß§Ö§Ô§à §Õ§à§ç§à§Õ§Ú§ä, §á§â§Ú§ä§à§Þ §Ú §ß§Ö§Ý§ð§Ò§à§Ó§î §Ü §ß§Ö§Þ§å §ä§à§Û §Õ§Ö§Ó§å§ê§Ü§Ú, §Õ§Ý§ñ §Ü§à§ä§à§â§à§Û §Ö§Õ§Ú§ß§ã§ä§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§à §à§ß §ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý§ã§ñ §Ó §®§à§ã§Ü§Ó§å, §Ö§Þ§å §ã§à§Ó§Ö§â§ê§Ö§ß§ß§à §à§Ò§ì§ñ§ã§ß§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ, §à§ß §Ö§Û §Ú §Ó§ã§Ö§Þ §ß§Ñ­§á§Ý§Ö§Ó§Ñ§Ý §Ó §Ô§Ý§Ñ§Ù§Ñ §Ú §Ò§í§Ý §ä§Ñ§Ü§à§Ó. §¶§Ö§â§Ù§î §ä§à§Ø§Ö §â§Ñ§Ù§à§é§Ñ§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ã§é§×§ä §ã§Ó§à§Ö§Ô§à §ã§Ñ§ç§Ñ§â§Ñ §Þ§Ö§Õ§à§Ó§Ú§é§Ñ.

 

Sybil Shade¡¯s ¡°real¡± name seems to be Sofia Botkin (born Lastochkin). Lastochka (¡°The Swallow,¡± 1792-94) is a poem by Derzhavin. In the poem¡¯s closing lines (written after the death of ¡®Plenira,¡¯ the poet¡¯s first wife) Derzhavin compares his soul to the swallow:

 

§¥§å§ê§Ñ §Þ§à§ñ! §Ô§à§ã§ä§î§ñ §ä§í §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ:
§¯§Ö §ä§í §Ý§Ú §á§Ö§â§ß§Ñ§ä§Ñ §ã§Ú§ñ? ¡ª
§£§à§ã§á§à§Û §Ø§Ö §Ò§Ö§ã§ã§Þ§Ö§â§ä§Ú§Ö, §Ý§Ú§â§Ñ!
§£§à§ã§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§å, §Ó§à§ã§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§å §Ú §ñ, ¡ª
§£§à§ã§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§å, ¡ª §Ú §Ó §Ò§Ö§Ù§Õ§ß§Ö §ï§æ§Ú§â§Ñ
§µ§Ó§Ú§Ø§å §Ý§î §ä§Ö§Ò§ñ §ñ, §±§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§â§Ñ?

 

Explaining his comedy to Katenin, Griboedov says that Chatski (the main character in ¡°Woe from Wit¡±) ey i vsem napleval v glaza (spat in the eyes of Sofia and everybody). In his poem Shade says that we should spit into the eyes of our executioners (see the quote in my previous post). In the same letter to Katenin Griboedov compares himself to Moli¨¨re and discusses Moli¨¨re¡¯s characters:

 

§¥§Ñ! §Ú §ñ §Ü§à§Ý§Ú §ß§Ö §Ú§Þ§Ö§ð §ä§Ñ§Ý§Ñ§ß­§ä§Ñ §®§à§Ý§î§Ö§â§Ñ, §ä§à §á§à §Ü§â§Ñ§Û§ß§Ö§Û §Þ§Ö§â§Ö §é§Ú§ã§ä§à§ã§Ö§â§Õ§Ö§é§ß§Ö§Ö §Ö§Ô§à; §á§à§â§ä§â§Ö§ä§í, §Ú §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §á§à§â§ä§â§Ö§ä§í, §Ó§ç§à§Õ§ñ§ä §Ó §ã§à§ã§ä§Ñ§Ó §Ü§à§Þ§Ö§Õ§Ú§Ú §Ú §ä§â§Ñ§Ô§Ö§Õ§Ú§Ú, §Ó §ß§Ú§ç, §à§Õ§ß§Ñ§Ü§à, §Ö§ã§ä§î §é§Ö§â§ä§í, §ã§Ó§à§Û§ã§ä§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§í§Ö §Þ§ß§à§Ô§Ú§Þ §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§Þ §Ý§Ú§è§Ñ§Þ, §Ñ §Ú§ß§í§Ö §Ó§ã§Ö§Þ§å §â§à§Õ§å §é§Ö§Ý§à§Ó§Ö§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Þ§å §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à, §ß§Ñ§ã§Ü§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §é§Ö§Ý§à§Ó§Ö§Ü §á§à§ç§à§Ø §ß§Ñ §Ó§ã§Ö§ç §ã§Ó§à§Ú§ç §Õ§Ó§å§ß§à§Ô§Ú§ç §ã§à§Ò§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Û. §¬§Ñ§â§Ú§Ü§Ñ§ä§å§â §ß§Ö§ß§Ñ§Ó§Ú§Ø§å, §Ó §Þ§à§Ö§Û §Ü§Ñ§â§ä§Ú§ß§Ö §ß§Ú §à§Õ§ß§à§Û §ß§Ö §ß§Ñ§Û§Õ§×§ê§î. §£§à§ä §Þ§à§ñ §á§à§ï§ä§Ú§Ü§Ñ; §ä§í §Ó§à§Ý§Ö§ß §á§â§à§ã§Ó§Ö§ä§Ú§ä§î §Þ§Ö§ß§ñ, §Ú, §Ü§à§Ý§Ú §Ý§å§é§ê§Ö §é§ä§à §Ó§í§Õ§å§Þ§Ñ§Ö§ê§î, §ñ §á§à§Ù§Ñ§Û­§Þ§å§ã§î §à§ä §ä§Ö§Ò§ñ §ã §Ò§Ý§Ñ§Ô§à§Õ§Ñ§â§ß§à§ã§ä§Ú§ð. §£§à§à§Ò§ë§Ö §ñ §ß§Ú §á§Ö§â§Ö§Õ §Ü§Ö§Þ §ß§Ö §ä§Ñ§Ú§Ý§ã§ñ §Ú §ã§Ü§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §â§Ñ§Ù §á§à§Ó§ä§à§â§ñ§ð (§ã§Ó§Ú§Õ§Ö§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ã§ä§Ó§å§ð§ã§î §¨§Ñ§ß§Õ§â§à§Þ, §º§Ñ§ç§à§Ó§ã§Ü§Ú§Þ, §¤§â§Ö§é§Ö§Þ, §¢§å§Ý§Ô§Ñ§â§Ú§ß§í§Þ §Öt§ã., §Öt§ã., §Öt§ã.), §é§ä§à §ä§Ö§Ò§Ö §à§Ò§ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß §Ù§â§Ö§Ý§à§ã§ä§Ú§ð, §à§Ò§ì§×§Þ§à§Þ §Ú §Õ§Ñ§Ø§Ö §à§â§Ú§Ô§Ú§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§ã§ä§Ú§ð §Þ§à§Ö§Ô§à §Õ§Ñ§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ß§Ú§ñ, §Ö§ã§Ý§Ú §à§ß§à §Ö§ã§ä§î §Ó§à §Þ§ß§Ö. §°§Õ§ß§à §á§â§Ú­§Ò§Ñ§Ó§Ý§ð §à §ç§Ñ§â§Ñ§Ü§ä§Ö§â§Ñ§ç §®§à§Ý§î§Ö§â§Ñ: «§®§Ö§ë§Ñ§ß§Ú§ß §Ó§à §Õ§Ó§à§â§ñ§ß­§ã§ä§Ó§Ö», «§®§ß§Ú§Þ§í§Û §Ò§à§Ý§î§ß§à§Û» ¡ª §á§à§â§ä§â§Ö§ä§í, §Ú §á§â§Ö§Ó§à§ã§ç§à§Õ§ß§í§Ö; «§³§Ü§å§á§Ö§è» ¡ª §Ñ§ß§ä§â§à§á§à§ã §ã§à§Ò§ã§ä§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§à§Û §æ§Ñ§Ò§â§Ú§Ü§Ú, §Ú §ß§Ö§ã§ß§à§ã§Ö§ß.

 

In a letter of May 16, 1835, to Pushkin Katenin paraphrases the words of Boileau (the author of Epistle II A M. Moli¨¨re):

 

§³§Ó§à§ñ §³§Ö§Þ§î§ñ §Þ§Ú§Ý§Ñ, §Ó §¡§â§Ú§ã§ä§à§æ§Ñ§ß§Ö §è§Ö§Ý§Ñ§ñ §Ú§Õ§Ö§ñ, §Ú §Ò§å§Õ§î §Ó§ã§× §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ó§ä§à§â§à§Û §Ñ§Ü§ä, §Ó§í§ê§Ý§Ñ §Ò§í §Ó §ã§Ó§à§Ö§Þ §â§à§Õ§Ö §ç§à§â§à§ê§Ñ§ñ §Ü§à§Þ§Ö§Õ§Ú§ñ; §Ü§ß§ñ§Ù§î §ß§Ö §ä§ë§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ß§í§Û §ç§å§Õ§à§Ø§ß§Ú§Ü §Ú §ß§Ö §Ó§Ö§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ú§Û §á§à§ï§ä, §ß§à §Ó§à§á§â§Ö§Ü§Ú Boileau:

 

Il est bien des degr¨¦s du m¨¦diocre au pire

§ã§Ú§â§Ö§é§î §Õ§à §¬§å§Ü§à§Ý§î§ß§Ú§Ü§Ñ; §Ú §Ü§Ñ§Ü§Ú§Þ§Ú §ã§ä§Ú§ç§Ñ§Þ§Ú, §ã §ä§Ö§ç §á§à§â §Ü§Ñ§Ü §à§ß§Ú §Ó§Ù§Ò§å§ß§ä§à§Ó§Ñ§Ý§Ú§ã§î §á§â§à§ä§Ú§Ó§å §Ó§ã§Ö§ç §á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý, §à§ß§Ú §á§Ú§ê§å§ä!


In L¡¯Art Po¨¦tique (Chant IV) Boileau says: Il n'est point de degr¨¦ du m¨¦diocre au pire (he is not a degree from mediocre to worst). Gradus is Russian for ¡°degree.¡±

 

In a letter to his brother Sebastian mentions osskomina (a word used in the phrase nabit¡¯ oskominu, ¡°set the teeth on edge¡±) and vypolziny (shed snake-skins or pupae shed by insects):

 

I am fed up [osskomina] with a number of tortuous things and especially with the patterns of my shed snake-skins [vypolziny] so that now I find a poetic solace in the obvious and the ordinary which for some reason or other I had overlooked in the course of my life. (chapter 19)

 

Sebastian¡¯s vypolziny bring to mind the opening and closing lines of Gumilyov¡¯s poem Pamyat¡¯ (¡°Memory,¡± 1921):

 

§´§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §Ù§Þ§Ö§Ú §ã§Ò§â§Ñ§ã§í§Ó§Ñ§ð§ä §Ü§à§Ø§Ú,

§¹§ä§à§Ò §Õ§å§ê§Ñ §ã§ä§Ñ§â§Ö§Ý§Ñ §Ú §â§à§ã§Ý§Ñ.

§®§í, §å§Ó§í, §ã§à §Ù§Þ§Ö§ñ§Þ§Ú §ß§Ö §ã§ç§à§Ø§Ú,

§®§í §Þ§Ö§ß§ñ§Ö§Þ §Õ§å§ê§Ú, §ß§Ö §ä§Ö§Ý§Ñ.

 

Only snakes shed their skin,

So their souls can age and grow.

We, alas, do not resemble snakes,

We change souls, not bodies.

 

§¬§â§Ú§Ü§ß§å §ñ... §ß§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Ó§Ö §Ü§ä§à §á§à§Þ§à§Ø§Ö§ä,

§¹§ä§à§Ò §Þ§à§ñ §Õ§å§ê§Ñ §ß§Ö §å§Þ§Ö§â§Ý§Ñ?

§´§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §Ù§Þ§Ö§Ú §ã§Ò§â§Ñ§ã§í§Ó§Ñ§ð§ä §Ü§à§Ø§Ú,

§®§í §Þ§Ö§ß§ñ§Ö§Þ §Õ§å§ê§Ú, §ß§Ö §ä§Ö§Ý§Ñ.

 

I will cry out... but who can prevent

My soul from dying?

Only snakes shed their skin

We change souls, not bodies.

 

In one of his last articles, ¡°Bez bozhestva, bez vdokhnoven¡¯ya¡± (¡°Without Divinity, without Inspiration,¡± 1921), Alexander Blok criticizes Gumilyov and the acmeists who, according to Blok, deliberately hush up what is most significant and precious in them, the soul:

 

§¬§à§Ô§Õ§Ñ §à§ä§Ò§â§à§ã§Ú§ê§î §Ó§ã§Ö §ï§ä§Ú §Ô§à§â§î§Ü§Ú§Ö §ê§å§ä§Ü§Ú, §ã§ä§Ñ§ß§à§Ó§Ú§ä§ã§ñ §Ô§â§å§ã§ä§ß§à; §Ú§Ò§à §¯. §¤§å§Þ§Ú§Ý§×§Ó §Ú §ß§Ö§Ü§à§ä§à§â§í§Ö §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§Ö "§Ñ§Ü§Þ§Ö§Ú§ã§ä§í", §ß§Ö§ã§à§Þ§ß§Ö§ß§ß§à §Õ§Ñ§â§à§Ó§Ú§ä§í§Ö, §ä§à§á§ñ§ä §ã§Ñ§Þ§Ú§ç §ã§Ö§Ò§ñ §Ó §ç§à§Ý§à§Õ§ß§à§Þ §Ò§à§Ý§à§ä§Ö §Ò§Ö§Ù§Õ§å§ê§ß§í§ç §ä§Ö§à§â§Ú§Û §Ú §Ó§ã§ñ§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Ô§à §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§Ý§Ú§Ù§Þ§Ñ; §à§ß§Ú §ã§á§ñ§ä §ß§Ö§á§â§à§Ò§å§Õ§ß§í§Þ §ã§ß§à§Þ §Ò§Ö§Ù §ã§ß§à§Ó§Ú§Õ§Ö§ß§Ú§Û; §à§ß§Ú §ß§Ö §Ú§Þ§Ö§ð§ä §Ú §ß§Ö §Ø§Ö§Ý§Ñ§ð§ä §Ú§Þ§Ö§ä§î §ä§Ö§ß§Ú §á§â§Ö§Õ§ã§ä§Ñ§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ §à §â§å§ã§ã§Ü§à§Û §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§Ú §Ú §à §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§Ú §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ §Ó§à§à§Ò§ë§Ö; §Ó §ã§Ó§à§Ö§Û §á§à§ï§Ù§Ú§Ú (§Ñ §ã§Ý§Ö§Õ§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à, §Ú §Ó §ã§Ö§Ò§Ö §ã§Ñ§Þ§Ú§ç) §à§ß§Ú §Ù§Ñ§Þ§Ñ§Ý§é§Ú§Ó§Ñ§ð§ä §ã§Ñ§Þ§à§Ö §Ô§Ý§Ñ§Ó§ß§à§Ö, §Ö§Õ§Ú§ß§ã§ä§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§à §è§Ö§ß§ß§à§Ö: §Õ§å§ê§å. (3)

 

In his essay Blok mentions oskomina (one of Blok¡¯s favorite words that also occurs in his diaries):

 

§®§í §á§â§Ú§Ó§í§Ü§Ý§Ú §Ü §à§Ü§â§à§ê§Ü§Ö, §Ò§à§ä§Ó§Ú§ß§î§Ö §Ú §Ò§Ý§Ú§ß§Ñ§Þ, §Ú §æ§â§Ñ§ß§è§å§Ù§ã§Ü§Ñ§ñ §ä§â§Ñ§Ó§Ü§Ñ §ã §å§Ü§ã§å§ã§à§Þ §Ó §Ó§Ú§Õ§Ö §à§ä§Õ§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à§Ô§à §Ò§Ý§ð§Õ§Ñ §Þ§à§Ø§Ö§ä §á§à§ß§â§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ä§î§ã§ñ §Ý§Ú§ê§î §Ô§å§â§Þ§Ñ§ß§Ñ§Þ. §´§Ñ§Ü §Ú "§é§Ú§ã§ä§Ñ§ñ §á§à§ï§Ù§Ú§ñ" §Ý§Ú§ê§î §ß§Ñ §Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§å §Ó§à§Ù§Ò§å§Ø§Õ§Ñ§Ö§ä §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã §Ú §ã§á§à§â§í §ã§â§Ö§Õ§Ú "§ã§á§Ö§è§Ú§Ñ§Ý§Ú§ã§ä§à§Ó"; §ã§á§à§â§í §ï§ä§Ú §á§à§ä§å§ç§Ñ§ð§ä §ä§Ñ§Ü §Ø§Ö §Ò§í§ã§ä§â§à, §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ó§ã§á§í§ç§ß§å§Ý§Ú, §Ú §á§à§ã§Ý§Ö §ß§Ú§ç §à§ã§ä§Ñ§×§ä§ã§ñ §à§Õ§ß§Ñ §à§ã§Ü§à§Þ§Ú§ß§Ñ; §Ñ "§Ò§à§Ý§î§ê§Ñ§ñ §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ", §ß§Ú§Ü§Ñ§Ü§à§Ô§à §å§é§Ñ§ã§ä§Ú§ñ §Ó §ï§ä§à§Þ §ß§Ö §á§â§Ú§ß§Ú§Þ§Ñ§ð§ë§Ñ§ñ §Ú §ß§Ö §à§Ò§ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß§ß§Ñ§ñ §á§â§Ú§ß§Ú§Þ§Ñ§ä§î, §Ñ §ä§â§Ö§Ò§å§ð§ë§Ñ§ñ §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§à§ñ§ë§Ú§ç, §Ø§Ú§Ó§í§ç §ç§å§Õ§à§Ø§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§í§ç §á§â§à§Ú§Ù§Ó§Ö§Õ§Ö§ß§Ú§Û, §Ó§Ö§â§ç§ß§Ú§Þ §é§å§ä§î§×§Þ §Õ§à§Ô§Ñ§Õ§í§Ó§Ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ, §é§ä§à §Ó §Ý§Ú§ä§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§å§â§Ö §ß§Ö §ã§à§Ó§ã§Ö§Þ §Ò§Ý§Ñ§Ô§à§á§à§Ý§å§é§ß§à, §Ú §ß§Ñ§é§Ú§ß§Ñ§Ö§ä §à§ä§ß§à§ã§Ú§ä§î§ã§ñ §Ü §Ý§Ú§ä§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§å§â§Ö §ß§à§Ó§Ö§Û§ê§Ö§Û §ã§à§Ó§ã§Ö§Þ §Ú§ß§Ñ§é§Ö, §é§Ö§Þ §Ü §Ý§Ú§ä§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§å§â§Ö §ã§ä§Ñ§â§à§Û. (1)

 

Blok borrowed the title of his article from Pushkin¡¯s poem a K*** (¡°To***,¡± 1825):

 

§Á §á§à§Þ§ß§ð §é§å§Õ§ß§à§Ö §Þ§Ô§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§î§Ö:

§±§Ö§â§Ö§Õ§à §Þ§ß§à§Û §ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý§Ñ§ã§î §ä§í,

§¬§Ñ§Ü §Þ§Ú§Þ§à§Ý§Ö§ä§ß§à§Ö §Ó§Ú§Õ§Ö§ß§î§Ö,

§¬§Ñ§Ü §Ô§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §é§Ú§ã§ä§à§Û §Ü§â§Ñ§ã§à§ä§í.

 

§£ §ä§à§Þ§Ý§Ö§ß§î§ñ§ç §Ô§â§å§ã§ä§Ú §Ò§Ö§Ù§ß§Ñ§Õ§Ö§Ø§ß§à§Û

§£ §ä§â§Ö§Ó§à§Ô§Ñ§ç §ê§å§Þ§ß§à§Û §ã§å§Ö§ä§í,

§©§Ó§å§é§Ñ§Ý §Þ§ß§Ö §Õ§à§Ý§Ô§à §Ô§à§Ý§à§ã §ß§Ö§Ø§ß§í§Û,

§ª §ã§ß§Ú§Ý§Ú§ã§î §Þ§Ú§Ý§í§Ö §é§Ö§â§ä§í.

 

§º§Ý§Ú §Ô§à§Õ§í.  §¢§å§â§î §á§à§â§í§Ó §Þ§ñ§ä§Ö§Ø§ß§à§Û

§²§Ñ§ã§ã§Ö§ñ§Ý §á§â§Ö§Ø§ß§Ú§Ö §Þ§Ö§é§ä§í,

§ª §ñ §Ù§Ñ§Ò§í§Ý §ä§Ó§à§Û §Ô§à§Ý§à§ã §ß§Ö§Ø§ß§í§Û,

§´§Ó§à§Ú §ß§Ö§Ò§Ö§ã§ß§í§Ö §é§Ö§â§ä§í.

 

§£ §Ô§Ý§å§ê§Ú, §Ó§à §Þ§â§Ñ§Ü§Ö §Ù§Ñ§ä§à§é§Ö§ß§î§ñ

§´§ñ§ß§å§Ý§Ú§ã§î §ä§Ú§ç§à §Õ§ß§Ú §Þ§à§Ú

§¢§Ö§Ù §Ò§à§Ø§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ñ, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ó§Õ§à§ç§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§î§ñ,

§¢§Ö§Ù §ã§Ý§×§Ù, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§Ú, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ý§ð§Ò§Ó§Ú.

 

§¥§å§ê§Ö §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§Ñ§Ý§à §á§â§à§Ò§å§Ø§Õ§Ö§ß§î§Ö:

§ª §Ó§à§ä §à§á§ñ§ä§î §ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý§Ñ§ã§î §ä§í,

§¬§Ñ§Ü §Þ§Ú§Þ§à§Ý§Ö§ä§ß§à§Ö §Ó§Ú§Õ§Ö§ß§î§Ö,

§¬§Ñ§Ü §Ô§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §é§Ú§ã§ä§à§Û §Ü§â§Ñ§ã§à§ä§í.

 

§ª §ã§Ö§â§Õ§è§Ö §Ò§î§×§ä§ã§ñ §Ó §å§á§à§Ö§ß§î§Ö,

§ª §Õ§Ý§ñ §ß§Ö§Ô§à §Ó§à§ã§Ü§â§Ö§ã§Ý§Ú §Ó§ß§à§Ó§î

§ª §Ò§à§Ø§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§à, §Ú §Ó§Õ§à§ç§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§î§Ö,

§ª §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§î, §Ú §ã§Ý§×§Ù§í, §Ú §Ý§ð§Ò§à§Ó§î.

 

I still recall the wondrous moment

When you appeared before my eyes,

Just like a fleeting apparition,

Just like pure beauty's distillation.

 

When'er I languished in the throes of hopeless grief

Amid the troubles of life's vanity,

Your sweet voice lingered on in me,

Your dear face came to me in dreams.

 

Years passed. The raging, gusty storms

Dispersed my former reveries,

And I forgot your tender voice,

Your features so divine.

 

In exile, in confinement's gloom,

My uneventful days wore on,

Without divinity, without inspiration

Without tears, without life, without love.

 

My soul awakened once again:

And once again you came to me,

Just like a fleeting apparition

Just like pure beauty's distillation.

 

My heart again resounds in rapture,

Within it once again arise

Feelings of awe and inspiration,

Of life itself, of tears, and love.

 

The repetition of words and even of whole lines in Pushkin¡¯s poem brings to mind ¡°sure returns of expected rhymes¡± mentioned by Pope in Essay on Criticism. This seems to suggest that the first line of Shade¡¯s poem should be repeated again at the end and that the rhyme slain-windowpane should also return:

 

I was the shadow of the waxwing slain

By its own double in the windowpane. (ll. 1000-1001)

 

Dvoynik (¡°The Double,¡± 1914) is a poem by Blok. According to G. Ivanov, when he asked Blok ¡°does a sonnet need a coda,¡± Blok replied that he did not know what a coda is. Line 1001 of Shade¡¯s poem is its coda.

 

Alexey Sklyarenko

Google Search
the archive
Contact
the Editors
NOJ Zembla Nabokv-L
Policies
Subscription options AdaOnline NSJ Ada Annotations L-Soft Search the archive VN Bibliography Blog

All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.