I'm coming late to the discussion (and haven't read all the posts on this question), so I apologize if this is a repeat of what someone else has said

However, I believe you also have to look at the function the missing last line fulfills in the novel as a whole. Namely, it allows Kinbote a "way in." 

--- On Fri, 5/14/10, Anthony Stadlen <STADLEN@AOL.COM> wrote:

From: Anthony Stadlen <STADLEN@AOL.COM>
Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] Fw: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Date: Friday, May 14, 2010, 6:17 AM

In a message dated 13/05/2010 23:51:08 GMT Daylight Time, chtodel@COX.NET writes:
Does it not seem apropos, that the missing final line (1000) is intended to mark the ultimate indeterminacy of the afterlife issue?  It seems a fitting conclusion, no?   Don Johnson
That is indeed what I have been trying to suggest.
 
Anthony Stadlen
 
 
Anthony Stadlen
"Oakleigh"
2A Alexandra Avenue
GB - London N22 7XE
Tel.: +44 (0) 20 8888 6857
Email:
stadlen@aol.com
Founder in 1996 of the Inner Circle Seminars: an ethical, existential, phenomenological search for truth in psychotherapy.
See
"Existential Psychotherapy & Inner Circle Seminars" at http://anthonystadlen.blogspot.com/ for coming seminars and complete archive of past Inner Circle Seminars
 
 
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.

Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.