On 29/07/2011 00:54, "jansymello" <jansy@AETERN.US> wrote:

* Lacan uses the model of Achilles and Briseida (a slave-girl, or the tortoise...) representing infinite regress to explain how, according to his theory, men and women can never ever really meet in a (symbolic, ie, a verbalizable) sexual embrace...
 ----
 Perhaps ‘the enslaved-QUEEN,’ rather than ‘a slave-girl,’ better describes Briseis (later spelling, Briseida), she who caused so much trouble ‘twixt Achilles and Agamemnon in the Illiad. Indeed, one might call her central to Homer’s yarn!

It’s depressing that Lacan can shamelessly deploy his mathematical ignorance with such pseudo-paradoxical nonsense. The Hare does catch the Tortoise; and, barring a Lacanian Virgin-Birth, his parents did manage a real, verbalizable [sic] sexual embrace!

Stan Kelly-Bootle
Google Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal" Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options Visit AdaOnline View NSJ Ada Annotations Temporary L-Soft Search the archive

All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.