Mr. Nabokov loved the freedom of the United States, and hated the system of government that for most of the last century cost so many millions of lives and dreams in the land of his birth and its surrounding regions. But I seriously doubt he would consider the Washington Times as representative of his views.

VN could enjoy Playboy and the National Review (especially in complimentary subscriptions), but even those publications, in the sixties, were miles higher in intellectual content than a miserable rag like the Washington Times --- which, from my viewing of it, does not reflect the views of Nabokov.

----------
From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
Sent:   Saturday, November 12, 2005 8:59 PM
To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject:        Spam: Fwd: Re: Stefan Sullivan: Nabokov's power hangs on 'Lolita'

I would just like to remind Mr Livingston that the politics of the
Washington Times reflects that of Mr Nabokov.

conservatively yours
Carolyn
------------------------------------------------
EDNOTE. Ah, yes, Mooney Tunes and Merrie Melodies--for those who are old enough
to remember Bugs Bunny.
---------------------------------------------

> From: "Donald B. Johnson" <chtodel@gss.ucsb.edu>
> Reply-To: Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:50:48 -0800
> To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
> Subject: Fwd: Re: Stefan Sullivan: Nabokov's power hangs on 'Lolita'
>
> Tom,
>
> Please remember that this review comes from The Washington Times.  Should we
> really expect perceptive criticism in a "newspaper" owned by the Moonies?
> (And
> if you think their lit crit is bad, you should try their politics.)
>
>
> Jay Livingston

----- End forwarded message -----