Vladimir Nabokov

NABOKV-L post 0011543, Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:44:16 -0700

Subject
Fwd: I think Nabokov was trying to write music ...
Date
Body
EDNOTE. This item actually refers to Vladimir Nabokov's composer cousin Nicholas
Nabokov. I seem to recall there is some mention of the Quixote ballet project in
correpondence between the cousins. There are, BTW, some glancing references to
VN in Nicholas Nabokov's memoir BAGAZH.
---------------------------------------------------

----- Forwarded message from spklein52@hotmail.com -----
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:53:01 -0400
From: "Sandy P. Klein" <spklein52@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: SPKlein52@HotMail.com
Subject: I think Nabokov was trying to write music ...
To: SPKlein52@HotMail.com


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/arts/dance/12bent.html[1] ARTS /
DANCE | June 12, 2005
Because Mr. B. Told Me So[2]
By TONI BENTLEY (NYT) NewsA muse restages, and revises, the
ballet Balanchine created for her. Andrea Mohin/The New York Times

Suzanne Farrell, a longtime muse for the choreographer George
Balanchine, is bringing his "Don Quixote" to the stage. The ballet
has not been performed since 1978.Because Mr. B. Told Me So By TONI
BENTLEY Published: June 12, 2005

I THINK the world needs to see this." Suzanne Farrell is standing in
an enormous sunlit studio in Toronto surveying 60-odd dancers - all
looking, watching and waiting for her direction. She is only six days
into teaching them George Balanchine's "Don Quixote," which they will
have to perform several weeks later, but she is confident. Her only
apprehension is the audience's "expecting it to be perfect," she
says. "Things will go wrong."

[3]Andrea Mohin/The New York Times

"Don Quixote" includes members of the Suzanne Farrell Ballet and the
National Ballet of Canada, who have been rehearsing in Toronto.

Pulling together any three-act ballet in just five weeks would be an
arduous task, and this is no ordinary ballet. Balanchine's "Don
Quixote" is perhaps the most controversial piece in his vast canon of
works. In contrast to the neo-Classical style - stripped of scenery,
costumes, acting, plot and overt sentiment - for which he was
revered, it is emotional, religious and flamboyantly theatrical.

When it had its premiere in 1965, both audiences and critics were
confused, ambivalent, even suspicious. In 1978, Balanchine retired it
from the repertory of New York City Ballet, and it has not been
performed since.

Observing a group of young dancers dashing across the stage, Ms.
Farrell is calm and articulate. "A profound diagonal," she instructs,
"and then an urgent kneel." The dancers repeat the sequence with,
indeed, more profound urgency. "That was good," she says to their
evident relief. Then she clarifies: "Goodish."

Now eight and a half hours into the long rehearsal day, she suggests
they run straight through all three acts - in reverse, using the
Balanchine theory that if you know where you're going, you know where
to start.

Act III ends stunningly, as a varied procession of monks, priests
and penitents passes before Don Quixote's deathbed in a scene of
escalating religious fervor. Finally, his humble servant girl
appears. She takes two pieces of wood and lays them on his chest in a
cross, and as he passes into the next world, she sinks to the side of
his bed in grief.

When the ballet was first performed, George Balanchine, who was then
61, danced the role of Don Quixote. And in the role of the servant
girl, whom Lincoln Kirstein, founder of the New York City Ballet with
Balanchine, described as "Dulcinea as Ideal Woman, Repentant
Magdalene, Innocent Shepherdess, Virgin of Seven Dolors," the
choreographer cast the 19-year-old Roberta Sue Ficker from
Cincinnati, recently re-christened, with a name pulled from the phone
book, as Suzanne Farrell.

Balanchine had not only choreographed this role for her, assigning
no understudy, he had also conceived the entire ballet as an
unmistakable love letter to her. Then at the outset of her remarkable
career, she went on to be his last - and longest-lasting - muse. On
opening night in 1965, she recalls, in the last scene Balanchine
surprised her when, unseen by the audience, he grabbed her hand and
pressed it tightly to his chest.

Today Ms. Farrell is the most respected advocate of his work. But
her production of "Don Quixote," which is to open on June 22 for six
performances at the Opera House at the Kennedy Center in Washington,
presented her with many challenges. During the 13 years of its life,
Balanchine made numerous changes to the ballet, adding dances, taking
out divertissements, cutting sections. There never was a true
"finished" version, so she has had to decide what to keep, what to
cut, what to preserve. (Full disclosure: This writer was the
co-author of Ms. Farrell's book about her life, "Holding On to the
Air.")

Does she have any qualms about adjusting Balanchine's choreography?
"No," she says simply. And with good reason. Their bond ran deep; his
confidence in her was total. She, more than any other living person,
most deeply understood, through her own body, his work and thereby
his morality.

In 1965 Life magazine featured on its cover Balanchine and Ms.
Farrell as the Don and Dulcinea. Inside he stated his credo: "Woman
is the goddess, the poetess, the muse. That is why I have a company
of beautiful girl dancers. I believe that the same is true of life,
that everything a man does he does for his ideal woman. You live only
one life, and you believe in something, and I believe in a little
thing like that." This "little thing like that" spawned the greatest
body of work in classical dance history.

THE better- known "Don Quixote," choreographed in 1869 by Petipa, is
a comic ballet that features the Don as a buffoonish secondary
character. But Balanchine's version takes the spiritual quest of
Cervantes's great novel, celebrating its 400th anniversary this year,
very seriously. One of only four full-length works that Balanchine
choreographed, it comprises hundreds of elaborate costumes,
operatic-scale scenery, a horse and a donkey, a 40-foot windmill, a
miniature puppet theater, a 30-foot giant slinging a massive sword,
and an original score by Nicolas Nabokov, a cousin of the novelist.

Ms. Farrell's new production is a million-dollar venture between her
company, the Suzanne Farrell Ballet, which operates under the aegis of
the Kennedy Center, and the National Ballet of Canada, which will
perform the work in Toronto in November 2006. The entire production,
including new sets by Zack Brown and costumes by Holly Hynes (all
being made in Canada), has been designed to fit into three trucks for
touring. For the Washington engagement, featuring 37 dancers from Ms.
Farrell's company and 17 from Canada, the original cast of dancers
from the 1965 premiere has been invited to opening night.

Ms. Farrell has been thinking for years about presenting "Don
Quixote," but she had to wait until her company - now only five years
old and still not employed on a full-time basis - was able to take on
the challenge. "I, too, had to be ready," she says quietly. She first
began talking to Michael M. Kaiser, president of the Kennedy Center,
about it two years ago.

To recreate this enormous ballet, Ms. Farrell had few tools: one
40-year-old, blurry black-and-white film (shot illegally during a
performance by the photographer Bert Stern) and one incomplete silent
color video from the 1970's. "That's what I'm working from," she says
with a smile, her enormous blue eyes flashing. "Partial vision and no
music. But I was around, and I watched everything. I wanted to be with
him. What could be more important?"

A recording of the score would have helped, but none was ever made.
So more than six months ago, she and Ron Matson, music director and
conductor for her company, started sorting out the published version
(which Balanchine and Nabokov were constantly editing along with the
ballet). The music is "a big challenge" Mr. Matson says. "It's a very
difficult score. As soon as the music starts, there is this kind of
awkwardness. I think Nabokov was trying to write music that
corresponded to the inside of Don Quixote's head. It is sometimes
thinly orchestrated but with numerous solos."

Mr. Matson played it on the piano, recorded it on his Macintosh
computer and burned a CD for Ms. Farrell to dance to in her living
room. They reconvened at the computer to make various cuts and edits
to the score. "I don't know how we would have done it without the
computer," he says, laughing, underscoring yet again how modern
technology is helping even classical art forms.

"I feel like Donna Quixote, in and out of reality," Ms. Farrell says
gleefully, of the process of sorting out the ballet and bringing it to
the stage. She feels appropriately missionary about the enterprise,
hoping to make it as accessible to its new audience as possible.

"I am sticking almost entirely to the first, 1965 version," she
explains, "which keeps closer to the story line with less
intervention of divertissements." She is also moving a dance, added
by Balanchine in the 1970's, from the third act to the first and
cutting the music that played at length before the curtain rose on
the Prologue. "We decided," Mr. Matson says, "that it was not
necessary, and better to get the audience into the ballet more
quickly. Suzanne, after all, was the ultimate musician on the stage.
She hears the music internally, without counting."

Casting the role of Dulcinea was difficult. Not because it was once
Ms. Farrell's - "I've never looked for dancers who look like me," she
explains - but because it requires a combination of innocence and
vulnerability, along with strong, if not demonic, technical assurance
for some of the riskiest off-balance point dancing ever choreographed.


"I need someone who can give themselves over to the ballet," Ms.
Farrell continues. "It's a mind-set. It's very hard to be young.
Today dancers often masquerade behind technique without revealing
anything of themselves, and the whole of 'Don Q.' is revealing. In
fact, everything Mr. B. did was always about revealing something of
you. It's hard, sometimes, to find a person amongst all the
ballerinas."

One of the dancers she chose to learn Dulcinea is the pretty and
petite - and, notably, Spanish - Sonia Rodriguez, a leading dancer
with the Canadian company. She will dance the role on opening night
in Washington. Less than a week of rehearsals, and she has learned
virtually all three acts.

"This is very different from our usual way of working," she says in
charmingly accented English, "where we are taught little section by
little section at a time and then slowly put it together. Suzanne
gives you everything, and by just doing it, you find your own way,
you create the role. It's a little shocking at first, but it brings
in more possibilities because you don't have someone picking at you
so much. The experience becomes bigger and freer. You take more
risks. She is wonderful at giving you ideas, but then letting you
find your own way. She doesn't hold anything back."

That includes her memories of Balanchine. As she puts her dancers
through their paces, her thoughts are very connected to the man who
created the ballet and who left it to her in his will. "I don't want
people to feel that I can't let go of Mr. B.," she says. " If I saw a
great choreographer out there, I'd be in his corner. But I don't see
anybody. Everyone can do steps. I can do steps."

Having retired from the stage in 1989, she says: "The further away I
get from my performing career, the more I feel that each ballet we did
together - even though they harvested wonderful work - was to bring
George and I to another level of understanding. 'Don Q.' brought us
together in such a way that we almost didn't have to speak, a level
of collaboration, a kind of equalization. It meant, 'look where we
can go.' "

Back in the studio, the reverse rehearsal proceeds through Act II,
set in a royal court where Don Quixote and Sancho Panza endure
numerous humiliations, and then Act I begins with the servant girl
entering the stage, barefoot, carrying a bowl of water. Don Quixote
has just realized his mission: to fight the impossible fight, to
dream the impossible dream and to defend his beloved woman in all her
guises. Preparing him for his travels, she kneels and washes his feet
and dries them with her hair. The imagery is unmistakable. Having
anointed her master, the girl rises, her bowl in hand, and slowly
climbs a steep staircase on stage right, as Dulcinea's theme music
plays for the first time, sweet and mournful.

She climbs, inexorably beckoned by a halo of warm, bright, soft
light, the kind that emanates from a Tiepolo ceiling fresco when the
heavens have cracked open. Balanchine called this "Dulcinea's light,"
and when Ms. Farrell was 19, it showed her where to go. Watching Ms.
Farrell, who will turn 60 in August, passing on this piece of her own
life, one still sees Dulcinea's light shining brightly into the future
of the fragile art form to which she has dedicated her life. And on
June 22, in the nation's capital, like a torch being passed, it will
guide a new Dulcinea.

Toni Bentley, who danced with the New York City Ballet for 10 years,
is the author of "The Surrender: An Erotic Memoir" and "Winter Season:
A Dancer's Journal."

Andrea Mohin/The New York Times

Suzanne Farrell, who is revising Balanchine's ballet, works with
Heather Ogden, right.



Links:
------
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/arts/dance/12bent.html
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/arts/dance/12bent.html
[3]
javascript:pop_me_up2(\'http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/06/12/arts/12bent_CA0ready.html\',
\'12bent_CA0ready\',
\'width=720,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes\')

----- End forwarded message -----